News:

In spite of the cost of living, it's still quite popular.

Main Menu

26 million copies of your wang out there

Started by VikingJuice, July 24, 2008, 03:12:51 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.


Jessie

we should have kept the quote pyramid up to rape Jessie in the face.

sapphirehart

Does anyone wonder why that wasn't considered child pornography?

Jessie

Nudity != porn, even for kids.

It has to be sexual in nature, or intended for sexual gratification.
we should have kept the quote pyramid up to rape Jessie in the face.

ReBurn

Quote from: Jessie on July 24, 2008, 07:44:17 PM
Nudity != porn, even for kids.

It has to be sexual in nature, or intended for sexual gratification.
Are you saying that you can have all of the pictures of naked kids you want as long as the person that took them did it for reasons other than to provide sexual gratification? My guess is that the FBI disagrees with you.





[attachment deleted by admin]
11:42:24 [Gamplayerx] I keep getting knocked up.
11:42:28 [Gamplayerx] Er. OUT!

Jessie

Well, I know that my brother videotaped his daughter getting in and out of the shower, and though they charged him with video voyeurism, they couldn't prosecute him because it was impossible to prove that he masturbated to the tape.

So, there's that.

In conclusion, yes, you can have pictures of naked kids if there's no sexual intent.   That's not to say you can't be falsely prosecuted, but as far as the law is concerned, childhood nudity isn't inherently illegal.
we should have kept the quote pyramid up to rape Jessie in the face.

ReBurn

Quote from: Jessie on July 25, 2008, 01:43:15 PM
Well, I know that my brother videotaped his daughter getting in and out of the shower, and though they charged him with video voyeurism, they couldn't prosecute him because it was impossible to prove that he masturbated to the tape.

So, there's that.

In conclusion, yes, you can have pictures of naked kids if there's no sexual intent.   That's not to say you can't be falsely prosecuted, but as far as the law is concerned, childhood nudity isn't inherently illegal.

[attachment deleted by admin]
11:42:24 [Gamplayerx] I keep getting knocked up.
11:42:28 [Gamplayerx] Er. OUT!

Jessie

Quote from: ReBurn on July 25, 2008, 01:54:58 PM
Quote from: Jessie on July 25, 2008, 01:43:15 PM
Well, I know that my brother videotaped his daughter getting in and out of the shower, and though they charged him with video voyeurism, they couldn't prosecute him because it was impossible to prove that he masturbated to the tape.

So, there's that.

In conclusion, yes, you can have pictures of naked kids if there's no sexual intent.   That's not to say you can't be falsely prosecuted, but as far as the law is concerned, childhood nudity isn't inherently illegal.
It was just like that, except with my sister in law peeking around the corner, instead of that dude, and pedobear was noticeably absent.  Musta been slacking that day.
we should have kept the quote pyramid up to rape Jessie in the face.

ReBurn

Quote from: Jessie on July 25, 2008, 01:58:49 PM
Quote from: ReBurn on July 25, 2008, 01:54:58 PM
Quote from: Jessie on July 25, 2008, 01:43:15 PM
Well, I know that my brother videotaped his daughter getting in and out of the shower, and though they charged him with video voyeurism, they couldn't prosecute him because it was impossible to prove that he masturbated to the tape.

So, there's that.

In conclusion, yes, you can have pictures of naked kids if there's no sexual intent.   That's not to say you can't be falsely prosecuted, but as far as the law is concerned, childhood nudity isn't inherently illegal.
It was just like that, except with my sister in law peeking around the corner, instead of that dude, and pedobear was noticeably absent.  Musta been slacking that day.
I'm just teasing you...I'm sorry.  :-*
11:42:24 [Gamplayerx] I keep getting knocked up.
11:42:28 [Gamplayerx] Er. OUT!

Jessie

Quote from: ReBurn on July 25, 2008, 02:18:17 PM
Quote from: Jessie on July 25, 2008, 01:58:49 PM
Quote from: ReBurn on July 25, 2008, 01:54:58 PM
Quote from: Jessie on July 25, 2008, 01:43:15 PM
Well, I know that my brother videotaped his daughter getting in and out of the shower, and though they charged him with video voyeurism, they couldn't prosecute him because it was impossible to prove that he masturbated to the tape.

So, there's that.

In conclusion, yes, you can have pictures of naked kids if there's no sexual intent.   That's not to say you can't be falsely prosecuted, but as far as the law is concerned, childhood nudity isn't inherently illegal.
It was just like that, except with my sister in law peeking around the corner, instead of that dude, and pedobear was noticeably absent.  Musta been slacking that day.
I'm just teasing you...I'm sorry.  :-*
I know, dummy.  I'm not upset.
we should have kept the quote pyramid up to rape Jessie in the face.

Beefy

There was a time when naked pictures of your kids were to be used as a means of embarrassment with neighbors and family members.

ReBurn

That was back when we knew our neighbors.
11:42:24 [Gamplayerx] I keep getting knocked up.
11:42:28 [Gamplayerx] Er. OUT!