http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=92833535 (http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=92833535)
Hard to believe it's been 17 years.
I hope it grew some.
Does anyone wonder why that wasn't considered child pornography?
Nudity != porn, even for kids.
It has to be sexual in nature, or intended for sexual gratification.
Quote from: Jessie on July 24, 2008, 07:44:17 PM
Nudity != porn, even for kids.
It has to be sexual in nature, or intended for sexual gratification.
Are you saying that you can have all of the pictures of naked kids you want as long as the person that took them did it for reasons other than to provide sexual gratification? My guess is that the FBI disagrees with you.
[attachment deleted by admin]
Well, I know that my brother videotaped his daughter getting in and out of the shower, and though they charged him with video voyeurism, they couldn't prosecute him because it was impossible to prove that he masturbated to the tape.
So, there's that.
In conclusion, yes, you can have pictures of naked kids if there's no sexual intent. That's not to say you can't be falsely prosecuted, but as far as the law is concerned, childhood nudity isn't inherently illegal.
Quote from: Jessie on July 25, 2008, 01:43:15 PM
Well, I know that my brother videotaped his daughter getting in and out of the shower, and though they charged him with video voyeurism, they couldn't prosecute him because it was impossible to prove that he masturbated to the tape.
So, there's that.
In conclusion, yes, you can have pictures of naked kids if there's no sexual intent. That's not to say you can't be falsely prosecuted, but as far as the law is concerned, childhood nudity isn't inherently illegal.
[attachment deleted by admin]
Quote from: ReBurn on July 25, 2008, 01:54:58 PM
Quote from: Jessie on July 25, 2008, 01:43:15 PM
Well, I know that my brother videotaped his daughter getting in and out of the shower, and though they charged him with video voyeurism, they couldn't prosecute him because it was impossible to prove that he masturbated to the tape.
So, there's that.
In conclusion, yes, you can have pictures of naked kids if there's no sexual intent. That's not to say you can't be falsely prosecuted, but as far as the law is concerned, childhood nudity isn't inherently illegal.
It was just like that, except with my sister in law peeking around the corner, instead of that dude, and pedobear was noticeably absent. Musta been slacking that day.
Quote from: Jessie on July 25, 2008, 01:58:49 PM
Quote from: ReBurn on July 25, 2008, 01:54:58 PM
Quote from: Jessie on July 25, 2008, 01:43:15 PM
Well, I know that my brother videotaped his daughter getting in and out of the shower, and though they charged him with video voyeurism, they couldn't prosecute him because it was impossible to prove that he masturbated to the tape.
So, there's that.
In conclusion, yes, you can have pictures of naked kids if there's no sexual intent. That's not to say you can't be falsely prosecuted, but as far as the law is concerned, childhood nudity isn't inherently illegal.
It was just like that, except with my sister in law peeking around the corner, instead of that dude, and pedobear was noticeably absent. Musta been slacking that day.
I'm just teasing you...I'm sorry. :-*
Quote from: ReBurn on July 25, 2008, 02:18:17 PM
Quote from: Jessie on July 25, 2008, 01:58:49 PM
Quote from: ReBurn on July 25, 2008, 01:54:58 PM
Quote from: Jessie on July 25, 2008, 01:43:15 PM
Well, I know that my brother videotaped his daughter getting in and out of the shower, and though they charged him with video voyeurism, they couldn't prosecute him because it was impossible to prove that he masturbated to the tape.
So, there's that.
In conclusion, yes, you can have pictures of naked kids if there's no sexual intent. That's not to say you can't be falsely prosecuted, but as far as the law is concerned, childhood nudity isn't inherently illegal.
It was just like that, except with my sister in law peeking around the corner, instead of that dude, and pedobear was noticeably absent. Musta been slacking that day.
I'm just teasing you...I'm sorry. :-*
I know, dummy. I'm not upset.
There was a time when naked pictures of your kids were to be used as a means of embarrassment with neighbors and family members.
That was back when we knew our neighbors.