News:

Incontinence Hotline ... Can you hold, please?

Main Menu

*facepalm*

Started by Beefy, December 04, 2008, 12:05:49 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Print
Go Down Pages1
User actions

Gamplayerx

#1
December 04, 2008, 01:18:59 PM
It's fairly unbelievable that they made an Arthur II -- much less think there's enough content for a remake.

meredith

#2
December 04, 2008, 01:44:43 PM
the best that you can do
the best that you can do
is fall in love

Gamplayerx

#3
December 04, 2008, 02:08:53 PM
And now I have to hurt you, hatty.  Sorry, but it's an imperative.

dazie

#4
December 04, 2008, 07:42:30 PM
Quote from: Gamplayerx on December 04, 2008, 02:08:53 PM
And now I have to hurt you, hatty.  Sorry, but it's an imperative.

I'm down with that.   :whip:
"Pinky, are you pondering what I'm pondering?"
I think so, Brain, but how will we get the Spice Girls into the paella?

VikingJuice

#5
December 05, 2008, 08:32:27 PM Last Edit: December 05, 2008, 08:34:07 PM by VikingJuice
Never touch another man's french fries.


LOVED that movie!!

Also, a Thing remake might be interesting.  It certainly lacked for effects and most copies I've seen are in bad condition from the film's decay.

Beefy

#6
December 05, 2008, 08:41:10 PM
Quote from: VikingJuice on December 05, 2008, 08:32:27 PM
Also, a Thing remake might be interesting.  It certainly lacked for effects

?!!!!

VikingJuice

#7
December 05, 2008, 08:43:41 PM
Quote from: Beefy on December 05, 2008, 08:41:10 PM
Quote from: VikingJuice on December 05, 2008, 08:32:27 PM
Also, a Thing remake might be interesting.  It certainly lacked for effects

?!!!!

Lacked quality effects.  The creature looked awful and the cup of blood looked like paint.
Print
Go Up Pages1
User actions