News:

mmmhhphh hmmph I chhoudnph hcjear youph wiff fis crunphing in my mouphthmph.

Main Menu

What is the worst sequel ever...

Started by Dry then Catch, April 14, 2005, 12:18:00 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Beefy


Gamplayerx

Quote from: DownSouth on April 14, 2005, 01:13:06 PM
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0097314/

I loved that movie.

You're a loony.  But, you also like House the original, so I guess I'll let it slide.

dazie

Gods and Generals.  (sequel/prequel to "Gettysburg")

How would I have made it better?  hmm... how about FOLLOW THE FUCKING BOOK YOU BASED THE DAMN MOVIE ON for starters?
"Pinky, are you pondering what I'm pondering?"
I think so, Brain, but how will we get the Spice Girls into the paella?

Infobahn


dazie

Quote from: Infobahn on April 14, 2005, 10:57:58 PM
Of North and South fame?

Oh HELL no.  These were both based on books- one by Jeff Shaara, one by Michael Shaara.  Gettysburg was based on "Killer Angels" and is an excellent movie.  Originally made by Turner for cable release, it was eventually released in the theatres.  Gods and Generals was based on the book of the same name and, while a decent movie, didn't measure up.  It didn't follow the book too closely and really focused on one character to the detriment of all others.
"Pinky, are you pondering what I'm pondering?"
I think so, Brain, but how will we get the Spice Girls into the paella?