I just got a lovely notice in my gamil saying that my bandwidth is at 80% and is about to be exceeded.
How does one measure bandwidth? ???
what are you distributing? DVDs?
Sit down. This is going to take me a while to explain.
Quote from: nallen on April 20, 2005, 01:56:12 PM
what are you distributing? DVDs?
No, this happened after I made that "Apache" page on my site...
Bite me, DS :)
Bandwidth is measure of how much data has transfered. If I am watching a video feed that is 300K then I am using 300 Kilobytes of bandwidth per second. If that video plays for 100 seconds then I have used 30,000 Kilobytes or 30 Megabytes of bandwidth total.
Quote from: Youphoric on April 20, 2005, 01:57:58 PM
Quote from: nallen on April 20, 2005, 01:56:12 PM
what are you distributing? DVDs?
No, this happened after I made that "Apache" page on my site...
Bite me, DS :)
Either remove the page entirely, or block it from public view. That will save some if you're getting close. Better having one of two pages unavailable than the whole site.
Quote from: DownSouth on April 20, 2005, 01:57:13 PM
Sit down. This is going to take me a while to explain.
Hahahaha!
My gamil is only at 25%.
Quote from: BigDun on April 20, 2005, 01:58:13 PM
Bandwidth is measure of how much data has transfered. If I am watching a video feed that is 300K then I am using 300 Kilobytes of bandwidth per second. If that video plays for 100 seconds then I have used 30,000 Kilobytes or 30 Megabytes of bandwidth total.
If it's streaming content.... A 300K file will only transfer 300K.
Quote from: dc on April 20, 2005, 01:59:41 PM
Quote from: Youphoric on April 20, 2005, 01:57:58 PM
Quote from: nallen on April 20, 2005, 01:56:12 PM
what are you distributing? DVDs?
No, this happened after I made that "Apache" page on my site...
Bite me, DS :)
Either remove the page entirely, or block it from public view. That will save some if you're getting close. Better having one of two pages unavailable than the whole site.
Hmm...I'm looking into things and it looks like it wasn't just today, I need to look into what caused it....
I know part of it is my guild's forum, but aside from my PM's it's not very active, and there's hardly anything on my site...
Quote from: dc on April 20, 2005, 02:01:39 PM
Quote from: BigDun on April 20, 2005, 01:58:13 PM
Bandwidth is measure of how much data has transfered. If I am watching a video feed that is 300K then I am using 300 Kilobytes of bandwidth per second. If that video plays for 100 seconds then I have used 30,000 Kilobytes or 30 Megabytes of bandwidth total.
If it's streaming content.... A 300K file will only transfer 300K.
Yes, when I was saying 300K I was meaning that the bitrate was 300K. If you have a 500 KB file that gets downloaded 100 times then you have used 500 K * 100 = 50,000K or 50 Megabytes of bandwidth.
Quote from: BigDun on April 20, 2005, 02:03:50 PM
Quote from: dc on April 20, 2005, 02:01:39 PM
Quote from: BigDun on April 20, 2005, 01:58:13 PM
Bandwidth is measure of how much data has transfered. If I am watching a video feed that is 300K then I am using 300 Kilobytes of bandwidth per second. If that video plays for 100 seconds then I have used 30,000 Kilobytes or 30 Megabytes of bandwidth total.
If it's streaming content.... A 300K file will only transfer 300K.
Yes, when I was saying 300K I was meaning that the bitrate was 300K. If you have a 500 KB file that gets downloaded 100 times then you have used 500 K * 100 = 50,000K or 50 Megabytes of bandwidth.
And that doesn't even count the Kilobytes that get wasted when there's someone like Eo around.
Quote from: dc on April 20, 2005, 02:05:36 PM
Quote from: BigDun on April 20, 2005, 02:03:50 PM
Quote from: dc on April 20, 2005, 02:01:39 PM
Quote from: BigDun on April 20, 2005, 01:58:13 PM
Bandwidth is measure of how much data has transfered. If I am watching a video feed that is 300K then I am using 300 Kilobytes of bandwidth per second. If that video plays for 100 seconds then I have used 30,000 Kilobytes or 30 Megabytes of bandwidth total.
If it's streaming content.... A 300K file will only transfer 300K.
Yes, when I was saying 300K I was meaning that the bitrate was 300K. If you have a 500 KB file that gets downloaded 100 times then you have used 500 K * 100 = 50,000K or 50 Megabytes of bandwidth.
And that doesn't even count the Kilobytes that get wasted when there's someone like Eo around.
First of all, you need to stop the excessive quoting.
Quote from: ignom on April 20, 2005, 02:08:25 PM
Quote from: dc on April 20, 2005, 02:05:36 PM
Quote from: BigDun on April 20, 2005, 02:03:50 PM
Quote from: dc on April 20, 2005, 02:01:39 PM
Quote from: BigDun on April 20, 2005, 01:58:13 PM
Bandwidth is measure of how much data has transfered. If I am watching a video feed that is 300K then I am using 300 Kilobytes of bandwidth per second. If that video plays for 100 seconds then I have used 30,000 Kilobytes or 30 Megabytes of bandwidth total.
If it's streaming content.... A 300K file will only transfer 300K.
Yes, when I was saying 300K I was meaning that the bitrate was 300K. If you have a 500 KB file that gets downloaded 100 times then you have used 500 K * 100 = 50,000K or 50 Megabytes of bandwidth.
And that doesn't even count the Kilobytes that get wasted when there's someone like Eo around.
First of all, you need to stop the excessive quoting.
I know. Waste, waste, waste.
Quote from: dc on April 20, 2005, 02:09:23 PM
Quote from: ignom on April 20, 2005, 02:08:25 PM
Quote from: dc on April 20, 2005, 02:05:36 PM
Quote from: BigDun on April 20, 2005, 02:03:50 PM
Quote from: dc on April 20, 2005, 02:01:39 PM
Quote from: BigDun on April 20, 2005, 01:58:13 PM
Bandwidth is measure of how much data has transfered. If I am watching a video feed that is 300K then I am using 300 Kilobytes of bandwidth per second. If that video plays for 100 seconds then I have used 30,000 Kilobytes or 30 Megabytes of bandwidth total.
If it's streaming content.... A 300K file will only transfer 300K.
Yes, when I was saying 300K I was meaning that the bitrate was 300K. If you have a 500 KB file that gets downloaded 100 times then you have used 500 K * 100 = 50,000K or 50 Megabytes of bandwidth.
And that doesn't even count the Kilobytes that get wasted when there's someone like Eo around.
First of all, you need to stop the excessive quoting.
I know. Waste, waste, waste.
Iagree, the excessive quoting has
got to stop.
Quote from: Infobahn on April 20, 2005, 02:20:07 PM
Quote from: dc on April 20, 2005, 02:09:23 PM
Quote from: ignom on April 20, 2005, 02:08:25 PM
Quote from: dc on April 20, 2005, 02:05:36 PM
Quote from: BigDun on April 20, 2005, 02:03:50 PM
Quote from: dc on April 20, 2005, 02:01:39 PM
Quote from: BigDun on April 20, 2005, 01:58:13 PM
Bandwidth is measure of how much data has transfered. If I am watching a video feed that is 300K then I am using 300 Kilobytes of bandwidth per second. If that video plays for 100 seconds then I have used 30,000 Kilobytes or 30 Megabytes of bandwidth total.
If it's streaming content.... A 300K file will only transfer 300K.
Yes, when I was saying 300K I was meaning that the bitrate was 300K. If you have a 500 KB file that gets downloaded 100 times then you have used 500 K * 100 = 50,000K or 50 Megabytes of bandwidth.
And that doesn't even count the Kilobytes that get wasted when there's someone like Eo around.
First of all, you need to stop the excessive quoting.
I know. Waste, waste, waste.
Iagree, the excessive quoting has got to stop.
Quoting wastes bandwidth?
Quote from: Youphoric on April 20, 2005, 02:22:14 PM
Quote from: Infobahn on April 20, 2005, 02:20:07 PM
Quote from: dc on April 20, 2005, 02:09:23 PM
Quote from: ignom on April 20, 2005, 02:08:25 PM
Quote from: dc on April 20, 2005, 02:05:36 PM
Quote from: BigDun on April 20, 2005, 02:03:50 PM
Quote from: dc on April 20, 2005, 02:01:39 PM
Quote from: BigDun on April 20, 2005, 01:58:13 PM
Bandwidth is measure of how much data has transfered. If I am watching a video feed that is 300K then I am using 300 Kilobytes of bandwidth per second. If that video plays for 100 seconds then I have used 30,000 Kilobytes or 30 Megabytes of bandwidth total.
If it's streaming content.... A 300K file will only transfer 300K.
Yes, when I was saying 300K I was meaning that the bitrate was 300K. If you have a 500 KB file that gets downloaded 100 times then you have used 500 K * 100 = 50,000K or 50 Megabytes of bandwidth.
And that doesn't even count the Kilobytes that get wasted when there's someone like Eo around.
First of all, you need to stop the excessive quoting.
I know. Waste, waste, waste.
Iagree, the excessive quoting has got to stop.
Quoting wastes bandwidth?
I don't get it.
Quote from: cnamon on April 20, 2005, 02:22:37 PM
Quote from: Youphoric on April 20, 2005, 02:22:14 PM
Quote from: Infobahn on April 20, 2005, 02:20:07 PM
Quote from: dc on April 20, 2005, 02:09:23 PM
Quote from: ignom on April 20, 2005, 02:08:25 PM
Quote from: dc on April 20, 2005, 02:05:36 PM
Quote from: BigDun on April 20, 2005, 02:03:50 PM
Quote from: dc on April 20, 2005, 02:01:39 PM
Quote from: BigDun on April 20, 2005, 01:58:13 PM
Bandwidth is measure of how much data has transfered. If I am watching a video feed that is 300K then I am using 300 Kilobytes of bandwidth per second. If that video plays for 100 seconds then I have used 30,000 Kilobytes or 30 Megabytes of bandwidth total.
If it's streaming content.... A 300K file will only transfer 300K.
Yes, when I was saying 300K I was meaning that the bitrate was 300K. If you have a 500 KB file that gets downloaded 100 times then you have used 500 K * 100 = 50,000K or 50 Megabytes of bandwidth.
And that doesn't even count the Kilobytes that get wasted when there's someone like Eo around.
First of all, you need to stop the excessive quoting.
I know. Waste, waste, waste.
Iagree, the excessive quoting has got to stop.
Quoting wastes bandwidth?
I don't get it.
Each character is one byte. Every time you quote a previous statement, the quoted characters get added into the cumulative bandwidth required to download the entire thread. Why this quoted comment alone must be using at least .001 Megabyte.
Quote from: cnamon on April 20, 2005, 02:22:37 PM
Quote from: Youphoric on April 20, 2005, 02:22:14 PM
Quote from: Infobahn on April 20, 2005, 02:20:07 PM
Quote from: dc on April 20, 2005, 02:09:23 PM
Quote from: ignom on April 20, 2005, 02:08:25 PM
Quote from: dc on April 20, 2005, 02:05:36 PM
Quote from: BigDun on April 20, 2005, 02:03:50 PM
Quote from: dc on April 20, 2005, 02:01:39 PM
Quote from: BigDun on April 20, 2005, 01:58:13 PM
Bandwidth is measure of how much data has transfered. If I am watching a video feed that is 300K then I am using 300 Kilobytes of bandwidth per second. If that video plays for 100 seconds then I have used 30,000 Kilobytes or 30 Megabytes of bandwidth total.
If it's streaming content.... A 300K file will only transfer 300K.
Yes, when I was saying 300K I was meaning that the bitrate was 300K. If you have a 500 KB file that gets downloaded 100 times then you have used 500 K * 100 = 50,000K or 50 Megabytes of bandwidth.
And that doesn't even count the Kilobytes that get wasted when there's someone like Eo around.
First of all, you need to stop the excessive quoting.
I know. Waste, waste, waste.
Iagree, the excessive quoting has got to stop.
Quoting wastes bandwidth?
I don't get it.
Would y'all quit it!
Quote from: BigDun on April 20, 2005, 02:25:38 PM
Quote from: cnamon on April 20, 2005, 02:22:37 PM
Quote from: Youphoric on April 20, 2005, 02:22:14 PM
Quote from: Infobahn on April 20, 2005, 02:20:07 PM
Quote from: dc on April 20, 2005, 02:09:23 PM
Quote from: ignom on April 20, 2005, 02:08:25 PM
Quote from: dc on April 20, 2005, 02:05:36 PM
Quote from: BigDun on April 20, 2005, 02:03:50 PM
Quote from: dc on April 20, 2005, 02:01:39 PM
Quote from: BigDun on April 20, 2005, 01:58:13 PM
Bandwidth is measure of how much data has transfered. If I am watching a video feed that is 300K then I am using 300 Kilobytes of bandwidth per second. If that video plays for 100 seconds then I have used 30,000 Kilobytes or 30 Megabytes of bandwidth total.
If it's streaming content.... A 300K file will only transfer 300K.
Yes, when I was saying 300K I was meaning that the bitrate was 300K. If you have a 500 KB file that gets downloaded 100 times then you have used 500 K * 100 = 50,000K or 50 Megabytes of bandwidth.
And that doesn't even count the Kilobytes that get wasted when there's someone like Eo around.
First of all, you need to stop the excessive quoting.
I know. Waste, waste, waste.
Iagree, the excessive quoting has got to stop.
Quoting wastes bandwidth?
I don't get it.
Each character is one byte. Every time you quote a previous statement, the quoted characters get added into the cumulative bandwidth required to download the entire thread. Why this quoted comment alone must be using at least .001 Megabyte.
How much now?
Quote from: Gamplayerx on April 20, 2005, 02:35:53 PM
Quote from: BigDun on April 20, 2005, 02:25:38 PM
Quote from: cnamon on April 20, 2005, 02:22:37 PM
Quote from: Youphoric on April 20, 2005, 02:22:14 PM
Quote from: Infobahn on April 20, 2005, 02:20:07 PM
Quote from: dc on April 20, 2005, 02:09:23 PM
Quote from: ignom on April 20, 2005, 02:08:25 PM
Quote from: dc on April 20, 2005, 02:05:36 PM
Quote from: BigDun on April 20, 2005, 02:03:50 PM
Quote from: dc on April 20, 2005, 02:01:39 PM
Quote from: BigDun on April 20, 2005, 01:58:13 PM
Bandwidth is measure of how much data has transfered. If I am watching a video feed that is 300K then I am using 300 Kilobytes of bandwidth per second. If that video plays for 100 seconds then I have used 30,000 Kilobytes or 30 Megabytes of bandwidth total.
If it's streaming content.... A 300K file will only transfer 300K.
Yes, when I was saying 300K I was meaning that the bitrate was 300K. If you have a 500 KB file that gets downloaded 100 times then you have used 500 K * 100 = 50,000K or 50 Megabytes of bandwidth.
And that doesn't even count the Kilobytes that get wasted when there's someone like Eo around.
First of all, you need to stop the excessive quoting.
I know. Waste, waste, waste.
Iagree, the excessive quoting has got to stop.
Quoting wastes bandwidth?
I don't get it.
Each character is one byte. Every time you quote a previous statement, the quoted characters get added into the cumulative bandwidth required to download the entire thread. Why this quoted comment alone must be using at least .001 Megabyte.
How much now?
15,134 Bytes.
Quote from: BigDun on April 20, 2005, 02:47:06 PM
Quote from: Gamplayerx on April 20, 2005, 02:35:53 PM
Quote from: BigDun on April 20, 2005, 02:25:38 PM
Quote from: cnamon on April 20, 2005, 02:22:37 PM
Quote from: Youphoric on April 20, 2005, 02:22:14 PM
Quote from: Infobahn on April 20, 2005, 02:20:07 PM
Quote from: dc on April 20, 2005, 02:09:23 PM
Quote from: ignom on April 20, 2005, 02:08:25 PM
Quote from: dc on April 20, 2005, 02:05:36 PM
Quote from: BigDun on April 20, 2005, 02:03:50 PM
Quote from: dc on April 20, 2005, 02:01:39 PM
Quote from: BigDun on April 20, 2005, 01:58:13 PM
Bandwidth is measure of how much data has transfered. If I am watching a video feed that is 300K then I am using 300 Kilobytes of bandwidth per second. If that video plays for 100 seconds then I have used 30,000 Kilobytes or 30 Megabytes of bandwidth total.
If it's streaming content.... A 300K file will only transfer 300K.
Yes, when I was saying 300K I was meaning that the bitrate was 300K. If you have a 500 KB file that gets downloaded 100 times then you have used 500 K * 100 = 50,000K or 50 Megabytes of bandwidth.
And that doesn't even count the Kilobytes that get wasted when there's someone like Eo around.
First of all, you need to stop the excessive quoting.
I know. Waste, waste, waste.
Iagree, the excessive quoting has got to stop.
Quoting wastes bandwidth?
I don't get it.
Each character is one byte. Every time you quote a previous statement, the quoted characters get added into the cumulative bandwidth required to download the entire thread. Why this quoted comment alone must be using at least .001 Megabyte.
How much now?
15,134 Bytes.
How much NOW?
Quote from: Gamplayerx on April 20, 2005, 02:48:57 PM
Quote from: BigDun on April 20, 2005, 02:47:06 PM
Quote from: Gamplayerx on April 20, 2005, 02:35:53 PM
Quote from: BigDun on April 20, 2005, 02:25:38 PM
Quote from: cnamon on April 20, 2005, 02:22:37 PM
Quote from: Youphoric on April 20, 2005, 02:22:14 PM
Quote from: Infobahn on April 20, 2005, 02:20:07 PM
Quote from: dc on April 20, 2005, 02:09:23 PM
Quote from: ignom on April 20, 2005, 02:08:25 PM
Quote from: dc on April 20, 2005, 02:05:36 PM
Quote from: BigDun on April 20, 2005, 02:03:50 PM
Quote from: dc on April 20, 2005, 02:01:39 PM
Quote from: BigDun on April 20, 2005, 01:58:13 PM
Bandwidth is measure of how much data has transfered. If I am watching a video feed that is 300K then I am using 300 Kilobytes of bandwidth per second. If that video plays for 100 seconds then I have used 30,000 Kilobytes or 30 Megabytes of bandwidth total.
If it's streaming content.... A 300K file will only transfer 300K.
Yes, when I was saying 300K I was meaning that the bitrate was 300K. If you have a 500 KB file that gets downloaded 100 times then you have used 500 K * 100 = 50,000K or 50 Megabytes of bandwidth.
And that doesn't even count the Kilobytes that get wasted when there's someone like Eo around.
First of all, you need to stop the excessive quoting.
I know. Waste, waste, waste.
Iagree, the excessive quoting has got to stop.
Quoting wastes bandwidth?
I don't get it.
Each character is one byte. Every time you quote a previous statement, the quoted characters get added into the cumulative bandwidth required to download the entire thread. Why this quoted comment alone must be using at least .001 Megabyte.
How much now?
15,134 Bytes.
How much NOW?
11 more. Unless spaces count.
:laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:
I laughed at this whole damned thread!!! How much bandwith do you suppose my smiley icons suck up?
Bandwidth is like a big thick penis...
Quote from: Infobahn on April 20, 2005, 03:16:24 PM
Bandwidth is like a big thick penis...
Elusive and not worth the effort?
Quote from: jessie on April 20, 2005, 02:59:14 PM
Quote from: Gamplayerx on April 20, 2005, 02:48:57 PM
Quote from: BigDun on April 20, 2005, 02:47:06 PM
Quote from: Gamplayerx on April 20, 2005, 02:35:53 PM
Quote from: BigDun on April 20, 2005, 02:25:38 PM
Quote from: cnamon on April 20, 2005, 02:22:37 PM
Quote from: Youphoric on April 20, 2005, 02:22:14 PM
Quote from: Infobahn on April 20, 2005, 02:20:07 PM
Quote from: dc on April 20, 2005, 02:09:23 PM
Quote from: ignom on April 20, 2005, 02:08:25 PM
Quote from: dc on April 20, 2005, 02:05:36 PM
Quote from: BigDun on April 20, 2005, 02:03:50 PM
Quote from: dc on April 20, 2005, 02:01:39 PM
Quote from: BigDun on April 20, 2005, 01:58:13 PM
Bandwidth is measure of how much data has transfered. If I am watching a video feed that is 300K then I am using 300 Kilobytes of bandwidth per second. If that video plays for 100 seconds then I have used 30,000 Kilobytes or 30 Megabytes of bandwidth total.
If it's streaming content.... A 300K file will only transfer 300K.
Yes, when I was saying 300K I was meaning that the bitrate was 300K. If you have a 500 KB file that gets downloaded 100 times then you have used 500 K * 100 = 50,000K or 50 Megabytes of bandwidth.
And that doesn't even count the Kilobytes that get wasted when there's someone like Eo around.
First of all, you need to stop the excessive quoting.
I know. Waste, waste, waste.
Iagree, the excessive quoting has got to stop.
Quoting wastes bandwidth?
I don't get it.
Each character is one byte. Every time you quote a previous statement, the quoted characters get added into the cumulative bandwidth required to download the entire thread. Why this quoted comment alone must be using at least .001 Megabyte.
How much now?
15,134 Bytes.
How much NOW?
11 more. Unless spaces count.
;D
Quote from: eo000 on April 20, 2005, 05:11:03 PM
Quote from: jessie on April 20, 2005, 02:59:14 PM
Quote from: Gamplayerx on April 20, 2005, 02:48:57 PM
Quote from: BigDun on April 20, 2005, 02:47:06 PM
Quote from: Gamplayerx on April 20, 2005, 02:35:53 PM
Quote from: BigDun on April 20, 2005, 02:25:38 PM
Quote from: cnamon on April 20, 2005, 02:22:37 PM
Quote from: Youphoric on April 20, 2005, 02:22:14 PM
Quote from: Infobahn on April 20, 2005, 02:20:07 PM
Quote from: dc on April 20, 2005, 02:09:23 PM
Quote from: ignom on April 20, 2005, 02:08:25 PM
Quote from: dc on April 20, 2005, 02:05:36 PM
Quote from: BigDun on April 20, 2005, 02:03:50 PM
Quote from: dc on April 20, 2005, 02:01:39 PM
Quote from: BigDun on April 20, 2005, 01:58:13 PM
Bandwidth is measure of how much data has transfered. If I am watching a video feed that is 300K then I am using 300 Kilobytes of bandwidth per second. If that video plays for 100 seconds then I have used 30,000 Kilobytes or 30 Megabytes of bandwidth total.
If it's streaming content.... A 300K file will only transfer 300K.
Yes, when I was saying 300K I was meaning that the bitrate was 300K. If you have a 500 KB file that gets downloaded 100 times then you have used 500 K * 100 = 50,000K or 50 Megabytes of bandwidth.
And that doesn't even count the Kilobytes that get wasted when there's someone like Eo around.
First of all, you need to stop the excessive quoting.
I know. Waste, waste, waste.
Iagree, the excessive quoting has got to stop.
Quoting wastes bandwidth?
I don't get it.
Each character is one byte. Every time you quote a previous statement, the quoted characters get added into the cumulative bandwidth required to download the entire thread. Why this quoted comment alone must be using at least .001 Megabyte.
How much now?
15,134 Bytes.
How much NOW?
11 more. Unless spaces count.
;D
See? You just made smoke come out of the server.
Quote from: dc on April 20, 2005, 05:12:35 PM
Quote from: eo000 on April 20, 2005, 05:11:03 PM
Quote from: jessie on April 20, 2005, 02:59:14 PMSHIT! MY BAD!!
Quote from: Gamplayerx on April 20, 2005, 02:48:57 PM
Quote from: BigDun on April 20, 2005, 02:47:06 PM
Quote from: Gamplayerx on April 20, 2005, 02:35:53 PM
Quote from: BigDun on April 20, 2005, 02:25:38 PM
Quote from: cnamon on April 20, 2005, 02:22:37 PM
Quote from: Youphoric on April 20, 2005, 02:22:14 PM
Quote from: Infobahn on April 20, 2005, 02:20:07 PM
Quote from: dc on April 20, 2005, 02:09:23 PM
Quote from: ignom on April 20, 2005, 02:08:25 PM
Quote from: dc on April 20, 2005, 02:05:36 PM
Quote from: BigDun on April 20, 2005, 02:03:50 PM
Quote from: dc on April 20, 2005, 02:01:39 PM
Quote from: BigDun on April 20, 2005, 01:58:13 PM
Bandwidth is measure of how much data has transfered. If I am watching a video feed that is 300K then I am using 300 Kilobytes of bandwidth per second. If that video plays for 100 seconds then I have used 30,000 Kilobytes or 30 Megabytes of bandwidth total.
If it's streaming content.... A 300K file will only transfer 300K.
Yes, when I was saying 300K I was meaning that the bitrate was 300K. If you have a 500 KB file that gets downloaded 100 times then you have used 500 K * 100 = 50,000K or 50 Megabytes of bandwidth.
And that doesn't even count the Kilobytes that get wasted when there's someone like Eo around.
First of all, you need to stop the excessive quoting.
I know. Waste, waste, waste.
Iagree, the excessive quoting has got to stop.
Quoting wastes bandwidth?
I don't get it.
Each character is one byte. Every time you quote a previous statement, the quoted characters get added into the cumulative bandwidth required to download the entire thread. Why this quoted comment alone must be using at least .001 Megabyte.
How much now?
15,134 Bytes.
How much NOW?
11 more. Unless spaces count.
;D
See? You just made smoke come out of the server.
Quote from: jessie on April 20, 2005, 05:04:39 PM
Quote from: Infobahn on April 20, 2005, 03:16:24 PM
Bandwidth is like a big thick penis...
Elusive and not worth the effort?
The bigger the pipe, the larger the throughput.
Quote from: eo000 on April 20, 2005, 05:13:15 PM
Quote from: dc on April 20, 2005, 05:12:35 PM
Quote from: eo000 on April 20, 2005, 05:11:03 PM
Quote from: jessie on April 20, 2005, 02:59:14 PMSHIT! MY BAD!!
Quote from: Gamplayerx on April 20, 2005, 02:48:57 PM
Quote from: BigDun on April 20, 2005, 02:47:06 PM
Quote from: Gamplayerx on April 20, 2005, 02:35:53 PM
Quote from: BigDun on April 20, 2005, 02:25:38 PM
Quote from: cnamon on April 20, 2005, 02:22:37 PM
Quote from: Youphoric on April 20, 2005, 02:22:14 PM
Quote from: Infobahn on April 20, 2005, 02:20:07 PM
Quote from: dc on April 20, 2005, 02:09:23 PM
Quote from: ignom on April 20, 2005, 02:08:25 PM
Quote from: dc on April 20, 2005, 02:05:36 PM
Quote from: BigDun on April 20, 2005, 02:03:50 PM
Quote from: dc on April 20, 2005, 02:01:39 PM
Quote from: BigDun on April 20, 2005, 01:58:13 PM
Bandwidth is measure of how much data has transfered. If I am watching a video feed that is 300K then I am using 300 Kilobytes of bandwidth per second. If that video plays for 100 seconds then I have used 30,000 Kilobytes or 30 Megabytes of bandwidth total.
If it's streaming content.... A 300K file will only transfer 300K.
Yes, when I was saying 300K I was meaning that the bitrate was 300K. If you have a 500 KB file that gets downloaded 100 times then you have used 500 K * 100 = 50,000K or 50 Megabytes of bandwidth.
And that doesn't even count the Kilobytes that get wasted when there's someone like Eo around.
First of all, you need to stop the excessive quoting.
I know. Waste, waste, waste.
Iagree, the excessive quoting has got to stop.
Quoting wastes bandwidth?
I don't get it.
Each character is one byte. Every time you quote a previous statement, the quoted characters get added into the cumulative bandwidth required to download the entire thread. Why this quoted comment alone must be using at least .001 Megabyte.
How much now?
15,134 Bytes.
How much NOW?
11 more. Unless spaces count.
;D
See? You just made smoke come out of the server.
And now you're trying to mess up the pretty pattern....
Quote from: dc on April 20, 2005, 05:14:26 PM
Quote from: eo000 on April 20, 2005, 05:13:15 PM
Quote from: dc on April 20, 2005, 05:12:35 PM
Quote from: eo000 on April 20, 2005, 05:11:03 PM
Quote from: jessie on April 20, 2005, 02:59:14 PMSHIT! MY BAD!!
Quote from: Gamplayerx on April 20, 2005, 02:48:57 PM
Quote from: BigDun on April 20, 2005, 02:47:06 PMI
Quote from: Gamplayerx on April 20, 2005, 02:35:53 PMWOULD
Quote from: BigDun on April 20, 2005, 02:25:38 PMNEVER!
Quote from: cnamon on April 20, 2005, 02:22:37 PM
Quote from: Youphoric on April 20, 2005, 02:22:14 PM
Quote from: Infobahn on April 20, 2005, 02:20:07 PM
Quote from: dc on April 20, 2005, 02:09:23 PM
Quote from: ignom on April 20, 2005, 02:08:25 PM
Quote from: dc on April 20, 2005, 02:05:36 PM
Quote from: BigDun on April 20, 2005, 02:03:50 PM
Quote from: dc on April 20, 2005, 02:01:39 PM
Quote from: BigDun on April 20, 2005, 01:58:13 PM
Bandwidth is measure of how much data has transfered. If I am watching a video feed that is 300K then I am using 300 Kilobytes of bandwidth per second. If that video plays for 100 seconds then I have used 30,000 Kilobytes or 30 Megabytes of bandwidth total.
If it's streaming content.... A 300K file will only transfer 300K.
Yes, when I was saying 300K I was meaning that the bitrate was 300K. If you have a 500 KB file that gets downloaded 100 times then you have used 500 K * 100 = 50,000K or 50 Megabytes of bandwidth.
And that doesn't even count the Kilobytes that get wasted when there's someone like Eo around.
First of all, you need to stop the excessive quoting.
I know. Waste, waste, waste.
Iagree, the excessive quoting has got to stop.
Quoting wastes bandwidth?
I don't get it.
Each character is one byte. Every time you quote a previous statement, the quoted characters get added into the cumulative bandwidth required to download the entire thread. Why this quoted comment alone must be using at least .001 Megabyte.
How much now?
15,134 Bytes.
How much NOW?
11 more. Unless spaces count.
;D
See? You just made smoke come out of the server.
And now you're trying to mess up the pretty pattern....
yeah, i don't think that will work, but it's worth a shot.
Quote from: eo000 on April 20, 2005, 05:16:04 PM
Quote from: dc on April 20, 2005, 05:14:26 PM
Quote from: eo000 on April 20, 2005, 05:13:15 PM
Quote from: dc on April 20, 2005, 05:12:35 PM
Quote from: eo000 on April 20, 2005, 05:11:03 PM
Quote from: jessie on April 20, 2005, 02:59:14 PMSHIT! MY BAD!!
Quote from: Gamplayerx on April 20, 2005, 02:48:57 PM
Quote from: BigDun on April 20, 2005, 02:47:06 PMI
Quote from: Gamplayerx on April 20, 2005, 02:35:53 PMWOULD
Quote from: BigDun on April 20, 2005, 02:25:38 PMNEVER!
Quote from: cnamon on April 20, 2005, 02:22:37 PM
Quote from: Youphoric on April 20, 2005, 02:22:14 PM
Quote from: Infobahn on April 20, 2005, 02:20:07 PM
Quote from: dc on April 20, 2005, 02:09:23 PM
Quote from: ignom on April 20, 2005, 02:08:25 PM
Quote from: dc on April 20, 2005, 02:05:36 PM
Quote from: BigDun on April 20, 2005, 02:03:50 PM
Quote from: dc on April 20, 2005, 02:01:39 PM
Quote from: BigDun on April 20, 2005, 01:58:13 PM
Bandwidth is measure of how much data has transfered. If I am watching a video feed that is 300K then I am using 300 Kilobytes of bandwidth per second. If that video plays for 100 seconds then I have used 30,000 Kilobytes or 30 Megabytes of bandwidth total.
If it's streaming content.... A 300K file will only transfer 300K.
Yes, when I was saying 300K I was meaning that the bitrate was 300K. If you have a 500 KB file that gets downloaded 100 times then you have used 500 K * 100 = 50,000K or 50 Megabytes of bandwidth.
And that doesn't even count the Kilobytes that get wasted when there's someone like Eo around.
First of all, you need to stop the excessive quoting.
I know. Waste, waste, waste.
Iagree, the excessive quoting has got to stop.
Quoting wastes bandwidth?
I don't get it.
Each character is one byte. Every time you quote a previous statement, the quoted characters get added into the cumulative bandwidth required to download the entire thread. Why this quoted comment alone must be using at least .001 Megabyte.
How much now?
15,134 Bytes.
How much NOW?
11 more. Unless spaces count.
;D
See? You just made smoke come out of the server.
And now you're trying to mess up the pretty pattern....
yeah, i don't think that will work, but it's worth a shot.
PRETTY!!
Quote from: Gamplayerx on April 20, 2005, 06:09:17 PM
Quote from: eo000 on April 20, 2005, 05:16:04 PM
Quote from: dc on April 20, 2005, 05:14:26 PM
Quote from: eo000 on April 20, 2005, 05:13:15 PM
Quote from: dc on April 20, 2005, 05:12:35 PM
Quote from: eo000 on April 20, 2005, 05:11:03 PM
Quote from: jessie on April 20, 2005, 02:59:14 PMSHIT! MY BAD!!
Quote from: Gamplayerx on April 20, 2005, 02:48:57 PM
Quote from: BigDun on April 20, 2005, 02:47:06 PMEO000
Quote from: Gamplayerx on April 20, 2005, 02:35:53 PMLIKES
Quote from: BigDun on April 20, 2005, 02:25:38 PMROOSTER
Quote from: cnamon on April 20, 2005, 02:22:37 PM
Quote from: Youphoric on April 20, 2005, 02:22:14 PM
Quote from: Infobahn on April 20, 2005, 02:20:07 PM
Quote from: dc on April 20, 2005, 02:09:23 PM
Quote from: ignom on April 20, 2005, 02:08:25 PM
Quote from: dc on April 20, 2005, 02:05:36 PM
Quote from: BigDun on April 20, 2005, 02:03:50 PM
Quote from: dc on April 20, 2005, 02:01:39 PM
Quote from: BigDun on April 20, 2005, 01:58:13 PM
Bandwidth is measure of how much data has transfered. If I am watching a video feed that is 300K then I am using 300 Kilobytes of bandwidth per second. If that video plays for 100 seconds then I have used 30,000 Kilobytes or 30 Megabytes of bandwidth total.
If it's streaming content.... A 300K file will only transfer 300K.
Yes, when I was saying 300K I was meaning that the bitrate was 300K. If you have a 500 KB file that gets downloaded 100 times then you have used 500 K * 100 = 50,000K or 50 Megabytes of bandwidth.
And that doesn't even count the Kilobytes that get wasted when there's someone like Eo around.
First of all, you need to stop the excessive quoting.
I know. Waste, waste, waste.
Iagree, the excessive quoting has got to stop.
Quoting wastes bandwidth?
I don't get it.
Each character is one byte. Every time you quote a previous statement, the quoted characters get added into the cumulative bandwidth required to download the entire thread. Why this quoted comment alone must be using at least .001 Megabyte.
How much now?
15,134 Bytes.
How much NOW?
11 more. Unless spaces count.
;D
See? You just made smoke come out of the server.
And now you're trying to mess up the pretty pattern....
yeah, i don't think that will work, but it's worth a shot.
PRETTY!!